Recovery of Cancer waiting-list backlog for poorly performing NHS Trust

May 2022 – March 2023

Background

Like many NHS providers, our client had significant challenges with managing its Cancer waiting-list, exasperated largely by the impact of Covid-19. Coupled with workforce issues, the Trust’s Cancer wait-times were increasing daily and they were struggling to tackle the growing backlog. At the point of engagement, over 3,000 cancer patients were being tracked every week and the data was showing over 600 waiting over 63 days. This posed a significant risk to the patients waiting for treatment and those yet to get a full diagnosis, so it was critical the Trust put in measures for rapid and effective recovery. Understandably the Trust became one of the worst performing in the Country for managing Cancer wait-times and there was a lot of external scrutiny at both a regional and national level. As such they set themselves a target to reduce the backlog by 40% by the end of the year.

Problem

Following Xylem being chosen as the preferred partner to assist the recovery of the Cancer waiting-list backlog and ultimately improve the Trust’s overall performance, our Associate Partner quickly embedded into the organisation and set about delivering a rapid diagnostic of Cancer services to establish what the priorities needed to be. This included:

  • Meeting with core members of the clinical team
  • Liaising with all pathway stakeholders (including Nursing, administrative and diagnostic teams)
  • Doing a line-by-line review of ‘Every’ patient on the PTL to understand root causes of breaches and where the pathway bottlenecks were occurring

One of the key issues driving the backlog was the fact that the Cancer Services department was significantly below establishment and the team did not have the capacity to look at the whole PTL all the time so were moving from specialty to specialty depending on where the numbers were peaking. As such the focus was solely on the backlog which was proving ineffective. Some of the other key findings from the review included:

  • The trust had an inflated PTL, where cohorts of benign patients were mixed together with suspected and or confirmed cases incorrectly
  • Pathology turnaround times were particularly challenged with the service overwhelmed by the volume of urgent’ suspected Cancer reporting requests
  • Inaccurate prioritisation of patients due to incorrect pathway management process
  • Misinterpretation of the CWT guidelines by the team

Following this it was identified that a validation and data quality exercise would need to be carried out at scale in order to determine if the backlog was accurate and effectively recover the Trust’s position.

Action

Having supported several NHS validation and data quality projects previously, we were able to quickly mobilise a team of data quality specialists and trackers with specialist experience of Cancer pathways. We also ensured the team had experience of using the systems used by our client ensuring training would be minimal and the team could hit the ground running.

Using a staggered approach, we deployed a team of Cancer trackers under the supervision of a Team Lead and the direction of our lead Associate Partner who was already on the ground.

In collaboration with the Trust, Xylem’s team first carried out an initial discovery phase which identified the gaps, opportunities to improve process as well as agree a way forward to tackle the growing backlog.

Our team first reviewed the PTL by specialty to understand the challenges and bottlenecks experienced by the various services. Through this we quickly identified that staff were being measured on the number of patients that they tracked each day which led to several people tracking the same patient just to keep up activity. This often resulted in patients having numerous tracking updates with no real progress along their patient journey.

Some of the steps for improvement we took over the next 8 weeks included:

  • Only updated patients if the tracking comment added value/provided an update of that patients journey along their pathway
  • Focused on the more challenged tumour sites including Urology LGI, UGI and Skin
  • Draft pro-forma’s were discussed with clinical teams to facilitate timely communication and removal of patients with non-malignant conditions
  • By focusing on the forward look and not just on the backlog PTL we were able to implement practices to ensure where possible we were working towards specific milestones and the number of patients tipping into the backlog was reduced
  • Patients were identified before their breach date thus allowing remedial actions to be implemented and ultimately preventing the breach
  • Trust staff were re-trained on how to manage patients in line with best practice and national guidance. Supporting this a 300 page training guide was created by our Associate Partner which taught about the application of the guidance and outlined the latest CWT guidelines which could then be replicated for all staff working on the Cancer PTL

Impact

  • In just 8 weeks Xylem’s team had assisted the Trust in reducing the Cancer waiting-list backlog by 40% meaning that the Trust went from being nationally the worst performing in terms of percentage of patients above day 62, to no longer being in the bottom 50 performing Trusts
  • We helped the Trust mitigate reputational damage across the system and nationally
  • Aided in staff training
  • Built resilience in the organisation to future-proof against continual pressures
  • Delivered 20% less than original budget providing significant return on investment
  • Implemented measures that helped the Trust deliver a complaint position against the 75% FDS operational standard
  • Implemented sustainable change in how cancer patients are managed going forwards
  • Developed key milestones for adequate escalation
  • Advised the Trust on where it was not implementing nationally recognised best practice and creating delays for patients

COLLABORATE • CONNECT • CREATE • CO-DELIVER

COLLABORATE
_

CONNECT
_

CREATE
_

CO-DELIVER

COLLABORATE • CONNECT • CREATE • CO-DELIVER

Collaborate for Success Connect for Growth Create for the Future Co Deliver for Impact

Collaborate

Collaborate to discover the problem

Connect

Connect to design the solution

Create

Create the action to move forward

Co-Deliver

Co-deliver to design the solution